Is it okay for companies to block social media sites for employees, or should they be free and open about the issue? It’s a hot button topic in many circles, and there are even sites cropping up like this one I found recently.
I recently ran across a neat site called Stop Blocking. The site has this to say:
Companies everywhere are blocking employee access to the Net, fueled by questionable research and irresponsible pronouncements of self-serving individuals and organizations. This site is designed to serve as a hub information resource for those who believe the benefits of providing access far outweigh the risks.
When (if ever) is it acceptable to block social sites, then? I’ve worked in places that blocked 90% of the web and places that blocked none. I think there’s a middle ground in there.
Now, I’m for the open web. I use social sites daily and my work just wouldn’t be the same without them. Companies that try to maintain a stranglehold on their users by blocking social sites are not the kinds of places I want to work for. But an interesting angle most openness proponents ignore is that of resources. Companies with one IT guy don’t have the resources to keep up with viruses and spyware people download via Facebook and MySpace. Those issues threaten the integrity of networks and can be a data security nightmare.
Another finite resource (with a nearly limitless demand!) is bandwidth. Checking your friend’s latest Facebook pictures of their kids and watching YouTube videos about cats can quickly suck down the network for everyone else (whether they’re trying to work or watch their own YouTube videos).
So… While I freely admit that I’m a fan of being open and forward thinking with regard to the social web, I am looking for answers to these pertinent issues.
Anyone have an idea to share?


My view of SHRM apparently is different than the growing disdain among my fellow HR Professionals. As I was developing my knowledge of HR at the University of Michigan, I was given a great deal of support by SHRM either directly or indirectly. There in lies the key to why I feel that SHRM is still a relevant organization. While in college, I went on to become the President of the student chapter of SHRM at my University. I’m not saying that to toot my own horn (Trust me, its doesn’t amont to a hill of beans), but because this is a good example of SHRM creating an opportunity that allowed for great personal growth. Without SHRM, there would have not been an affiliate chapter at the University of Michigan nor the opportunity to further my knowledge of HR so easily.